The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. Over the course of several months after the settlement of a personal injury matter, Mr. Kanarish made false statements about his purported fees to a doctor who had requested payment for services he had provided to Mr. Kanarish's clients. Ms. Lowery, who was licensed in 2000, was suspended for 30 days and required to successfully complete the ARDC Professionalism Seminar within one year. Mr. Henneberry, who was licensed in 1981, was disbarred on consent. While representing the client in a criminal matter, he did not respond to the client's family's requests for information about the case, collected an unreasonable fee of $9,000 when he made no court appearances and filed no pleadings or briefs, and returned only $2,000 of the fee. The Attorney Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona entered an order admonishing him and placing him on conditional probation for mishandling client funds and overdrawing his client trust account. Mr. Mason, who licensed in 2019, was suspended from the practice of law for five months. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Mr. Jones was licensed in Illinois in 1997 and in Florida in 2000. She also settled a separate case without authority and made false statements to another attorney about the status of that case. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. He was suspended on an interim basis on October 15, 2020. Mr. Rueda, who was licensed in 2011, was suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the suspension stayed after thirty days in favor of a two-year period of probation. Ms. Edgar was licensed in Illinois in 1990 and in California in 2005. While she was engaged in litigation in a federal court, Ms. Lane sent three e-mails containing false or reckless statements about a magistrate judge's integrity to the judge, courtroom personnel and another attorney involved in the case. The changes reduce the cost of returning to the master roll for retired status attorneys and attorneys whose ARDC registration has lapsed. If you have been removed from the master roll for failure to register with the ARDC, you can be reinstated by registering and paying the required registration fee and reinstatement fee. An interim suspension may also be . Mr. Pondenis, who was licensed in 2006, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. He failed to diligently handle a number of bankruptcy matters, did not adequately communicate with those clients, and made misrepresentations to those clients and his employer about the status of the cases. Ms. Hill-McClain, who was licensed in 1988, was suspended for six months and until she makes restitution of $16,300 to a client. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for one year and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Court of Missouri disbarred him for dishonestly failing to pay fees owed to a deceased attorney's trust after Mr. Raines took over representation in a number of cases on which the deceased attorney had worked prior to his death. She also filed a brief on appeal in a client's immigration matter without complying with mandatory legal authority concerning claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. In a 2019 matter, he was admonished for failing to distribute funds to a person owed the funds and not reasonably communicating with his client. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Mr. Kanarish was licensed in Illinois in 1971 and in Arizona in 2011. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for 90 days, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a two-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to November 23, 2020, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana, and continuing until her probation in Indiana is terminated. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for five months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Iowa. He neglected an incarcerated client's post-conviction matter and failed to communicate with that client. Over the course of five months, he misappropriated over $30,000 from a supplemental needs trust established for his disabled client. Mr. Wills, who was licensed in 2007, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after five months in favor of a two-year period of conditional probation. ILLINOIS - The Illinois Supreme Court's Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission has announced the suspension of two central Illinois attorneys. Mr. Kelly, who was licensed in 1987, was suspended for three months. The Indiana Supreme Court suspended him for three years, without automatic reinstatement, for failing to act with diligence in a criminal matter and a paternity case, failing to properly communicate with clients, and not cooperating in his own disciplinary proceedings. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for one year, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a one-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to November 21, 2020, subject to the conditions imposed in California, and continuing until she completes her California probation. Mr. Krkljes, who was licensed in 1988, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after 30 days in favor of a two-year period of probation with conditions. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Johnson, who was licensed in 1996, was disbarred on consent. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. Ms. Koroll, who was licensed in 2001, was suspended for six months, with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of a one-year period of conditional probation. Mj Toru: adorn minecraft mod crafting recipes creepy doll names girl ardc recent suspensions Dodane: 21:55, 18 grudnia 2021 Illinois Supreme Court disbars former Gov. He dishonestly converted $13,906.56 in funds belonging to two clients, failed to refund unearned fees, neglected and failed to effectively or timely communicate the status of matters to three clients, and failed to reduce two contingent fee agreements to writing. During a dissolution of marriage case, she came to an agreement with opposing counsel concerning parenting time, prepared a proposed order memorializing the agreement, and obtained opposing counsel's permission to submit the order to the trial judge for entry. Updated. Johnson, Matter Number: 2022PR00007, In re Jessica Rose Allen, Matter Number: 2021PR00055, In re Roni S. VanAusdall, Matter Number: 2021PR00039, In re Patrick Daley Thompson, Matter Number: 2022PR00014, In re Paul D. Buhl, Matter Number: 2021PR00075, In re Robert John Hankes, Matter Number: 2019PR00102, In re Brent Michael Wills, Matter Number: 2021PR00021, In re Timothy J. Fitzgerald, Matter Number: 2017PR00116, In re Michael Christopher Burr, Matter Number: 2021PR00004, In re Mark A. Hamill, Matter Number: 2021PR00016, In re Edward William Hynes, Matter Number: 2021PR00065, In re Jeffrey Marc Benjamin, Matter Number: 2021PR00052, In re William John Bowe, Matter Number: 2021PR00058, In re Patrick Jon Hudec, Matter Number: 2021PR00060, In re Thomas Michael Barrett, Matter Number: 2021PR00064, In re Jennifer Prager Sodaro, Matter Number: 2021PR00066, In re Robert Lee Officer, Matter Number: 2021PR00068, In re Sean Michael Liles, Matter Number: 2020PR00022, In re Leijuana Doss, Matter Number: 2021PR00022, In re Wanemond Smith, Matter Number: 2020PR00089, In re John P. Jacoby, Matter Number: 2021PR00067, In re Michael Leonard Loprieno, Matter Number: 2019PR00101, In re James Robert Mason, Matter Number: 2021PR00045, In re Todd William Sivia, Matter Number: 2021PR00015, In re Matthew Clay Piatt, Matter Number: 2021PR00024, In re Carrie Kooi, Matter Number: 2021PR00023, In re Barbara Julia Luther, Matter Number: 2021PR00025, In re Michael Bernard Potere, Matter Number: 2021PR00026, In re Cynthia Jean Koroll, Matter Number: 2016PR00079, In re Lisa Michelle Edgar, Matter Number: 2021PR00027, In re Craig Carnell Cunningham, Matter Number: 2019PR00019, In re Donald George Groble, Matter Number: 2020PR00081, In re Bryan S. Flangel, Matter Number: 2021PR00029, In re Andrew Martin Stroth, Matter Number: 2019PR00065, In re Alan Kent Wittig, Matter Number: 2021PR00033, In re John Anthony Ward, Matter Number: 2021PR00034, In re Henry A. Weber, Matter Number: 2020PR00087, In re James Mark McTighe, Matter Number: 2021PR00035, In re Efrain L. Sanchez, Matter Number: 2021PR00036, In re John George Steckel, Matter Number: 2021PR00038, In re Stephen Thomas Fieweger, Matter Number: 2021PR00042, In re Veronica Reyes, Matter Number: 2021PR00043, In re Peter J. Kovac, Matter Number: 2021PR00046, In re Edward Sergio Rueda, Matter Number: 2020PR00042, In re Brian David Pondenis, Matter Number: 2020PR00048, In re Mark Vincent Kelly, Matter Number: 2020PR00029, In re Barry Edward Blumenfeld, Matter Number: 2021PR00057, In re Stephanie Alexandra Gerstetter, Matter Number: 2021PR00050, In re Nathaniel Gordon, Matter Number: 2020PR00059, In re Jessica Lynn Jones, Matter Number: 2021PR00020, In re John Paul Paleczny, Matter Number: 2021PR00051, In re Jennifer Prager Sodaro, Matter Number: 2020PR00080, In re Jeffrey P. White, Matter Number: 2021PR00003, In re Hrant Norsigian Jr., Matter Number: 2021PR00005, In re Marie A. Durbin, Matter Number: 2021PR00006, In re Radford Reuben Raines III, Matter Number: 2021PR00007, In re Eric James Dale, Matter Number: 2021PR00009, In re Howard Randolph Baker Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00061, In re Michael Lee Henneberry, Matter Number: 2021PR00011, In re John Thomas Sheets, Matter Number: 2020PR00075, In re Dwight White, Matter Number: 2020PR00006, In re John L. Allen, Matter Number: 2021PR00013, In re William Briskin Kohn, Matter Number: 2019PR00008, In re Nikola Duric, Matter Number: 2015PR00052, In re Shelby Kanarish, Matter Number: 2021PR00014, In re Patrick J. O'Shea, Matter Number: 2020PR00037, In re Joseph C. Farwell, Matter Number: 2019PR00089, In re Lee Jackson, Matter Number: 2020PR00079, In re Joshua Nathan Levy, Matter Number: 2020PR00082, In re Rufus James Tate Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00085, In re Michael Jerome Moore, Matter Number: 2020PR00017, In re Ryne DeGrave, Matter Number: 2020PR00044, In re Jose Arvizu Bracamonte, Matter Number: 2021PR00001, In re Burton Douglas Stephens Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00021, In re Oscar Antonio Gonzalez, Matter Number: 2018PR00066, In re Nathaniel Jay Pomrenze, Matter Number: 2019PR00059, In re John Henry Salgado, Matter Number: 2019PR00073, In re Christopher Steven Jones, Matter Number: 2020PR00067, In re John Christopher Carver, Matter Number: 2020PR00074, In re Jan R. Kowalski, Matter Number: 2020PR00077, In re Robert Michael Kowalski, Matter Number: 2020PR00078, In re William Layne Roberts, Matter Number: 2019PR00021, In re Jeffrey Bart Cooper, Matter Number: 2020PR00066, In re Vincenzo Field, Matter Number: 2018PR00015, In re Thomas Eric Wettermann, Matter Number: 2020PR00031, In re Franklin Joseph Furlett, Matter Number: 2019PR00028, In re Charles Andrew Cohn, Matter Number: 2018PR00109, In re Joan Arthetta Hill-McClain, Matter Number: 2017PR00100, In re Andrew Thomas Freund, Matter Number: 2020PR00070, In re Dean William O'Connor, Matter Number: 2020PR00071, In re Mary L. Lemp, Matter Number: 2020PR00072, In re Anish A. Parikh, Matter Number: 2019PR00005, In re David M. Jankura, Matter Number: 2018PR00052, In re Shirley Ruth Calloway, Matter Number: 2020PR00032, In re John Hudson McWard, Matter Number: 2020PR00008, Pending Motions for Disbarment on Consent. Ms. VanAusdall, who was licensed to practice in 2003, was suspended for one year. The website for the ARDC can be found at www.iardc.org . Mr. Farwell, who was licensed in 1992, was suspended for ninety days. In 2019, she was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol and other offenses after she drove into a police patrol car. Mr. Duric, who was licensed in 1985, was disbarred. Over the course of ten weeks, he knowingly misappropriated $2,230 in funds he had agreed to hold in escrow pursuant to his work as an attorney agent for a title company. The suspension is effective on February 10, 2022. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Mr. Stephens, who was licensed in 1975, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. He recorded 277 hours in false time entries while working on a document review project for a large law firm. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. He failed to pursue a client's personal injury case, allowing the statute of limitations to expire. Mr. Thompson, who was licensed in 1999, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court. Ms. VanAusdall then created a second proposed order that included provisions that had not been agreed upon and falsely assured the trial judge that opposing counsel had agreed to the order she was presenting. Mr. Raines was licensed in Missouri in 1989 and in Illinois in 1997. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him. His wife, a paralegal at the firm, fraudulently opened accounts in the law firm's name using names of relatives and then used funds from those accounts to pay for law firm and personal expenses. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. He made false statements in federal court pleadings and in communications with opposing counsel and court personnel alleging a fictitious illness as his reason for seeking extensions of time in matters. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. He later returned $10,000 to the woman. The Supreme Court of Florida entered an order holding him in contempt and disbarring him for his failure to comply with a Florida Bar rule requiring him to notify his clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals of an earlier suspension, and requiring him to provide the Florida Bar with a sworn affidavit listing the names and addresses of all persons and entities that were furnished with a copy of the earlier suspension order. East St. Louis attorney Lawrence Joseph Hess and Valparaiso, Ind. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended Mr. Kovac for five months. Mr. Gordon failed to file a brief in his client's criminal appeal and did not refund the fees he received for the representation. Mr. Banks, who was licensed in 1965, was suspended for two years and until further order of the Court and was required to demonstrate that he has paid $7,000 in restitution, plus interest, to his former client's sister prior to petitioning for reinstatement. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for six months and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a one-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to February 8, 2022, subject to the conditions imposed in Missouri and continuing until he successfully completes his Missouri probation. The Supreme Court of Iowa reprimanded him for neglecting a client matter and failing to comply with Iowa disciplinary authorities' requests for information about his conduct. At the time of the conversion, Mr. Salgado was not maintaining the appropriate trust accounting records. If an objection is filed, the suspension shall not become effective until the evaluation of the objection is completed. His misconduct arose from his June 2021 conviction in Lake County for aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol, causing the death of another. In the course of representing a client in an immigration matter, she failed to file an application to adjust the client's visa status, made false statements about the status of the matter to the client, and generated two fabricated emails purportedly from an immigration agency in order to mislead the client about the status of the matter. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Mr. Schulz was licensed in Illinois in 1968 and in Virginia in 1982. Mr. McWard, who was licensed in 2017, was suspended for 90 days. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. Miles was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1975 and in California in 1985. Ms. Durbin was licensed in Missouri in 1986 and in Illinois in 1987. Sheldon Lee Banks, Deerfield The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Stone, who was licensed in 1996, was disbarred on consent for neglecting six client matters, failing to refund approximately $16,000 in unearned fees, and making misrepresentations to clients, a court and the ARDC regarding those matters and his health. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. The Supreme Court of Missouri suspended him indefinitely with no petition for reinstatement to be considered for six months for mishandling client funds and engaging in the unauthorized practice of law. Mr. Cunningham, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for six months. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for six months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona. During a telephone call with that attorney, Mr. Pomrenze threatened great harm to the other lawyers client if the client filed a criminal complaint against Mr. Pomrenze or if he submitted a complaint to the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission. Ms. Sarnicki, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for 30 days. Concurrently, total land growth rate decreased from 2.4 km2 y 1 to 1.6 km 2y 1 for ARSD and 3.2 km2 y 1to 0.6 km y for WLSD. In three separate legal matters, he repeatedly sent threatening and harassing email messages to other attorneys. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Mr. Unless otherwise noted, the mandate of discipline issued immediately. Mr. Duebbert, a former circuit court judge in St. Clair County who was licensed in 1990, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. Her discipline arose from her conviction for battery resulting in bodily injury for struggling and twice spitting on a police officer who had taken her to a hospital for a blood draw after stopping her on suspicion of impaired driving. She employed a former California attorney who had resigned from the bar with disciplinary charges pending and permitted him to handle client funds over approximately an eight-month period. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for three years and until he is reinstated in Indiana. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The Supreme Court of Missouri disbarred him for failing to diligently represent a client, failing to maintain complete records for his trust account, misappropriating more than $68,000 belonging to his clients, and making misrepresentations to a tribunal. The ARDC summaries contain the name of each disciplined lawyer, the community in which that lawyer last practiced, a brief summary of the misconduct and the disciplinary sanction ordered by the Court. Mr. Szymanski later pled guilty to misdemeanor battery in connection with that incident. He commingled and used without authority approximately $5,200 in others' funds in connection with real estate escrow and earnest money matters. e) The CPO may debar a vendor. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. While acting as an attorney agent for Attorneys' Title Guaranty Fund, Inc. in connection with various real estate matters, he converted $11,123 belonging to ATG and provided altered bank statements to ATG in order to conceal his conversions. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona entered an order suspending him, on a reciprocal basis, for 45 days, effective retroactively to July 15, 2020, based upon an order of discipline from the Executive Office for Immigration Review of the United States Department of Justice. Mr. Cooper, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. He agreed to the purported settlement of an underinsured motorist claim against his client, an insurance company, for $75,000 without the company's authorization, and repeatedly made false statements to his opposing counsel about the status of the purported settlement. Mr. Smith, who was licensed in 1995, was suspended for five months. who owns hask hair products; psychiatric interviews for teaching: mania; einstein medical center philadelphia internal medicine residency; mel e learning elysium; silas weir mitchell disability; how to calculate probability less than in excel; how to light a water heater with electronic pilot rheem; lakers celebrity fans Mr. Halling was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1993 and in Colorado in 1995. Mr. Tanzillo, who was licensed in 1986, was suspended for four months and was required to complete the ARDC Professionalism Seminar within one year of the order of discipline. is anya epstein related to jeffrey epstein. Mr. Newport was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1990 and in Iowa in 1978. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and imposed a reprimand and a 60-day suspension. Mr. Fonfrias, who was licensed in 1996, was suspended for six months. This page contains ARDC summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois. Mr. Darnell did not diligently pursue a client's personal injury matter, did not reasonably communicate with his client, and made misrepresentations to his client about the status of her matter. The Supreme Court of Missouri disbarred him for failing to perform services after accepting a fee, failing to properly hold client funds, failing to provide competent representation, and failing to cooperate in disciplinary investigations. He converted over $38,000 that he was supposed to hold for a third party in a real estate transaction by giving it to another client without the third partys consent. The Supreme Court of California disbarred him based on his attempt to extort more than $200,000 from his employer, which resulted in a misdemeanor conviction and five-month sentence of imprisonment for the federal criminal offense of unauthorized access to a computer to obtain information. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. Mr. White, who was licensed in 2014, was suspended for two years and until further order of the Court, stayed after one year in favor of a three-year period of probation subject to conditions. In a bankruptcy matter, he filed a declaration by his client that purported to certify that the client had reviewed certain schedules and statements when he knew the client had not reviewed them. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. DeGrave, who was licensed in 2015, was suspended for one year and until further order the Court for striking his then-wife in the face during an argument, which led to injuries requiring surgery. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for two years in Illinois, stayed after 90 days by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed in California and continuing until his California probation is satisfied. Mr. McNabola, who was licensed in 1985, was censured for misconduct in connection with two separate matters. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. Mr. Hudec was licensed in Wisconsin in 1979 and in Illinois in 1980. Ms. Calloway, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona suspended her for six months and one day. In two cases, Mr. Wills failed to appear in court for clients, leading to the dismissal of the cases. In her written response to her opposing counsels subsequent notice of irregular documents, she falsely stated that the notary public had notarized the motions. He committed the criminal act of aggravated battery on one of his neighbors, a woman over 60 years of age. In September 2021, a Michigan jury found him guilty of three counts of criminal sexual conduct. Mr. McCarty was licensed in 1998. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. O'Connor was licensed in Illinois in 1980 and in Arizona in 1988. The Supreme Court of Iowa suspended him with no possibility of reinstatement for one year for sexually harassing two clients. The Supreme Court of Iowa suspended him with no possibility for reinstatement for 30 days. In the course of representing clients in personal injury matters, he provided financial assistance to two clients, misrepresented the status of matters to at least two clients, and signed a client's name on a settlement release without authority. Mr. Bowe had continued to practice law after the administrative suspension of his law license, and he did not maintain required trust account records. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. He also misappropriated approximately $690,000 in funds that he had agreed to hold in trust related to two real estate transactions, transferred approximately $943,000 from his client trust accounts to his operating account without identifying the purpose of the disbursements or the client associated with them, and commingled more than $350,000 of operating account funds with client funds. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. In 2021, she was convicted of theft after she altered a site development plan that had earlier been prepared for her by a licensed engineer and submitted the altered plan to a county development department. Mr. Moonen is currently suspended in Iowa on a separate case involving his failure to cooperate with Iowa disciplinary authorities' investigations. In his plea agreement, Mr. Patel acknowledged that he and other defendants, including the CEO of a home healthcare company, engaged in what is known as a pump and dump scheme by conspiring to make it appear that there was an active market for shares in the company, when in fact those shares were thinly traded. He failed to properly communicate with his clients, waitresses who were the subject of charges that they had violated a local ordinance, and improperly represented the women despite a conflict of interest arising from his concurrent representation of the restaurant chain that employed them. The Supreme Court of Iowa suspended her with no possibility for reinstatement for one year. Mr. McIntyre, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for 18 months and until further order of the Court. Ms. Reyes was licensed in Illinois in 2009 and in Colorado in 2010. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. While working as an investigator for the Civilian Office of Police Accountability ("COPA") in Chicago, she repeatedly, and without authorization, accessed a private database of police records in violation of the terms of her employment. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. McTighe, who was licensed in 1991, was disbarred on consent. Mr. Sides, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court. The Michigan Attorney Discipline Board is the adjudicative arm of the Michigan Supreme Court for discharge of its exclusive constitutional responsibility to supervise and discipline Michigan attorneys. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for one year and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in New Jersey. He accomplished the conversion by reactivating a dormant client account at the law firm at which he was a shareholder, creating and sending multiple false invoices, directing payments to the formally dormant account, and submitting fraudulent reimbursement requests to his firm's accounting department. Mr. Kosztya dishonestly misappropriated over $58,000 from clients in two matters and then made false statements to the clients and a court to hide his use of the funds.
Does The Bourgeoisie Or The Proletariat Represent Workers?,
How To Reuse Vicks Vapopads,
Articles A